“It’s great to see things you may not buy – because you don’t have the money – but it is very ugly to think they shouldn’t exist because you can not buy them.”
He talks a bit more about the recession in the article, but I thought this statement raised some interesting questions about fashion in times like this. It’s easy to get caught up in deal-finding and trying to make fashion work for your budget, but on the other hand, if one looks at fashion as an art form then maybe haute couture still serves a purpose. Fashion certainly served as a form of escapism in the Thirties during the Great Depression (ask Grandma, she’ll tell you all about it). It didn’t matter that the average person couldn’t afford a satin, bias-cut Vionnet gown …people were happy to watch Jean Harlow wearing one on the big screen.
So what do you guys think? Should designers continue to focus on the art of fashion? Or is it time to respectfully reign it in with practical/classic designs and lower-priced lines like McQueen at Target or Ronson at JCPenny?